I have extended an open invitation to the man via email, to speak for himself directly regards the issue of venomoids (see quoted email bottom)
As yet I have no Response. My sole intrest at this point is determining the mans prevailing attitude toward the venomoid issue , to whit, if he stands by his action in preforming the so called operation and moreover if under circumstances he would willing or not to do so again.
I have read the mans own words about it from his website
snakebusters and smuggled
http://www.smuggled.com/SBSRep1.htm[quote]Quickly one off pain next to constantly pinning and stressing hots at live shows[/quote]
Im sorry I dont buy that reasoning Jo, A snake Is A snake Is A snake, If it has a predeliction to being flighty and easily stressed, Why use it for demos, In either case its going to stress anyway. I point out Countless exhibitors manage to display even wildcaught vens using hooks, no pinning involved and the snake is no more stressed than it might be anyway,
any snake might be stressed by being exibited, regardless of being freehandled.
from his own site.. a contradiction!
[quote]We rarely restrict handling of given reptiles due to the lack of evidence of stress caused by it.[/quote]
Either handling stresses them or it dosent, venomous or not, as I said, Ive witness very experience people exhibiting intact vens with no more than a hook, further the animals didnt looked at all stressed to me.
more..[quote]Venomoid Snakes:
These are the ones who have had their venom glands surgically removed to remove risks to handler and public during live shows.
In terms of the operation itself, we use the most up-to-date methods as documented by Hoser (2004).
Short term pain experienced by the snakes through the operation itself that have been operated on is minimal and the long-term benefits to the said snakes far outweigh this short term discomfort.
[/quote]
pain of the op is minimal? BS, how the bloody hell would you know?, because it cant scream? discomfort you call it? let me remove a couple of your wisdom teeth with a pen knife and see if 'the short term disconfort is minimal' ! The benefit will be that you will never get a tooth ache there again! wonderful!
Minimise risk to the handler? Whats wrong with hooks, tubes?
Is the man confident and competant to handle vens or not? I wouldnt hold against him if he didnt have the nerve, I dont, But whats he doing exhibiting if he dosent? Thats not a good reason either.
Minimise risk to the general public? whats wrong with a decent snake pit? again wheres the competance required to exhibit safely, surely there are laws. Still not a good reason.
That fact that this is STILL on his website, is boding ill for me, unless he hasnt had a chance to update it, I jump to no conclusions yet.
more..
[quote]There are no adverse effects known on the relevant snakes, however advantages of the venomoid state include elimination of (adverse) bite risk from one snake to another of different species if and when they are put together during a show (for comparison purposes) or if transported togeather.
[/quote]
Done the first bit, Why are different species put together period?
Excepting bagged and carried together which Ive seen others do (no reported attemps of a snakes bitting another while bagged that ive ever heard) comparison bit is just

, get an assistant to hold the other one and NOT close together!
Not buyin it!
[quote]More importantly, the venomouid state allows the snakes to be handled more casually by the handler, due to the elimination of adverse bite risk, the result being that the snakes reciprocate in kind and in turn become more tractable and well-adjusted.
[/quote]
NO Ray, they just become harmless. A cranky stressed venomoid retains its instincts to bite in defense, you havent removed that. Just means your not envenomated for your troubles in exhibiting a snake past the point that was fair, its telling you "I have had enough!"
[quote]The need to inflict pain on the said snakes with heavy sticks and hooks to handle in accordance with their venomous state is eliminated by the venomoid operation.
[/quote]
Say What, were talking about pain? A competent experienced exhibitor does NOT inflict pain on the snake with hooks, nor need heavy sticks. The 'operation' inflicts plenty!
[quote]Hence handling of these snakes for shows becomes a stress-free experience for the snakes, which is a result only (safely) attainable by use of the venomoid operation. [/quote]
NO. An experienced and competant exhibitor who knows his animals and uses a safty pit can SAFLY and stress free show them. Ive seen it!
[quote]The benefits of the venomoid state go far beyond what is seen by the public in the shows. Off-display, snakes need to be cleaned, moved about, their cages or boxes cleaned and all regularly inspected. It is here that the benefits of the venomoid state for the snakes realy becomes apparant and manifests in better adjusted reptiles that are in no fear of humans poking, necking and hooking them as would otherwise be the case.
[/quote]
Same old, see last response to same.
[quote]So obvious are the benefits of the venomoid state that in 2004 alone, Raymond Hoser/Snakebusters received over 200 requests from people with venomous snakes to perform the venomoid operation on their snakes, including at least three other (rival) reptile demonstrators. (For legal reasons we are unable to operate on other people's reptiles or trade venomoid snakes).
[/quote]
Now thats intresting! What legal reasons? libility? Whats the legality of doing it to your own?
Libility itself is not a legal reason, its a 'cover my a**' reason. Really like to see some paper on this one!
[quote]The only known affect of handling well-adjusted reptiles for shows and the like is that the extra movement seems to work up an appetite.
Hence the day after a show (or string of shows) tends to result in voracious reptiles devouring any food put in front of them.
[/quote]
Why is that thrown in? wheres the relavence, whats the claim?
The claim appears to be that so well adjusted are venomoids that it improves their appetite, as opposed to? intact vens haveless appetite?
C'mon stick to facts mate, stay relevant, if they have good appetites great, but dont imply that intact vens used for shows are any less well adjusted or healthy by comparisn, its a spurious 'snake oil' variety claim at best and sounds alot like
its said to bolster the readers beleif in whats been written about them. no more than that.
And thats all its says about it. If he still stands by that Im dissappointed to say the least, but as I said, Perhaps he no longer does, but hasnt removed it because he still shows the voids, never the less, it seems to say the same.
Having considered his reasons given for doing, I find myself disagreeing sharply, I do not accept his reasoning is valid. I am yet to hear of any logic or data suggestiong otherwise.
AS for my general thoughts of the man himself, That is my buisness and mine alone, I have read excerpts from his papers and his smuggled books and found them an intresting read, however I am not in any position to be able to judge the merit or integrity of anything hes written, therefor Im not intrested in doing so. Since I have not met the man, neither have I had any opportunity to form any impression of him what so ever.
This said I have also read many links pointed out to me, regards the man, written by others of good standing, and heard plenty about the man from persons Whos integrity I trust and whom Do know him personally, over the last 5 years.
Unfortunately for Ray, his detracters appear to far outweight his supporters atleast in the herp world.
Never the less, as stated earlier, My personal opinion, if and when I form one about him, will be my buisness and mine alone.
My only intrest is the venomoid issue and the prevailing attitude toward it. No so long ago most people accepted cutting dogs tails off for no better reason than it looked the part. We no longer accept the 'shovel' attitude, and personally I see no difference in that and reasons expressed for cruelly removing venom glands. Its my hope that this practice goes the way of the do do sooner rather than later, and its my feeling that exhibiting snakes treated thus, merely re-inforces the acceptance of it, among the general public who have little enough positive outlook for snakes as it is!
Further that his proclaiming it in such light as a positive thing, on his website does likewise, and makes apparent that his own attitude about it has not changed.
It is my firm beleif that the practice is cruel and unnessesary. Period.

quote]Dear Mr Hoser,
You don't know me, But Im inspired to contact you because I keep Reptiles, recently on a site called the Herphouse,
http://www.theherphouse.com/forums/index.php?
A thread About you was begun, but it was not to attack you as so many do but rather in your defence. From about 5 years of hearing all kinds of stories about you, most appeared to negative.
The majority seem to focus on the practice of creating venomoid snakes,
Which you are quite famous for one way or the other.
Im informed by some decent folk that you have not done this in years and no longer do so.
My curiosity about is aroused by this controversy and I have a desire to comprehend the reasoning for even having performed it. My feelings are that that there is no merit or benefit to be gained from creating a snake, which to all intents appears to be venomous species yet is unable to do so.
I understand the apparent intent was to aide in educating the general public, particularly against the 'shovel mentality', This I can Understand, yet with devices such as snake tubes readily available, I still don't conceive of any benefit.
Its my belief , as stated in the thread mentioned, that this will send an erronous message instead, appealing to male bravado, and perhaps inspiring innocent and possibly fatal mistakes in children who witness adults freely handling what are normally deadly snakes.
While I am appalled at anyone doing this to a snake, I have no intention of condeming you, rather because I don't know you, I have naturally questions about your reasoning for it in the first place, why you don't do it now and if you now consider it wrong to do and why.
I have personally done things that I now consider pretty horrible, beleiving strongly at the time in my conviction that it was right and worthwhile doing and that some real benefit would be ganed by doing so.
I deny nobody the the learning from mistakes, youthful idealism, enthusiasm, whatever it be, and see no point in condemning the person who has learnt and changed.
I condemn only those who continue it.
On the site I mentioned, I openly Invited you to have a voice for the purpous of answering these questions, likewise I extend the Offer on my own quiet little site 'Reptile Planet'
http://herproom.5.forumer.com/index.php?
Or the dialup version
http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reptile_Planet/index.php?act=siteHowever I understand that such an offer has been made before and that things went bad, and therfore I understand your possible reluctance.
However I am very intrested to hear from you on this matter, And quite happy to keep it strictly confidential. I have no interest in doing your name harm in any way, I simply wish to understand.
I will post this email on the herphouse to show that I have made such offer in good faith since it contains no confidential Information. Though a stranger to you, I offer you my word as a decent bloke that should you oblige my curiosity and ask that it be kept confidential, that it shall remain so.
I believe you have a right to speak for yourself and set facts straight, anywhere you are spoken of.
I hope to hear from you,
D.XXXXXX[/quote]
Though I deny nobody their right to express to express an opinion , Im surprised you decided to do so anyway Jo, It appears you have changed your mind. Good for you.

[QUOTE]The written word is open to interpretation, kali and dan you seem to have already made up your minds, I see no point in a public disscussion with ray contact him personally although I cant see what differance this will make.
[/QUOTE]
Incedently, I seem to Remember you being quite vocal against sombody who said they thought he wasnt too bright,
[quote]Kali you dissapoint me,
This thread is coming close to being nuked how dare you pass judgement on his mental capabilities.
[/quote]
but lo and behold, its ok for you to say it!
[quote]
Not to bright a man has succsefuuly defended himself in various court actions litigated and won,
[/quote]

[quote]Instead of bashing a bloke who's done heaps for the hobby, why not turn on those who make themselves out to be pillars of the herp world, while breeding & supplying the black market with exotics, creating or keeping voids of their own, or the numerous other incidents of underhanded dealings & skulduggery we are all aware of in the hobby?
Get the blinkers off, & have a good look at the morals of the herp game's icons before you start getting stuck into a bloke who keeps himself to himself & avoids the self-righteous posteuring of most forum contributors. The holier-than-thou attitudes so prevalent in this subject sicken me.[/quote]
It seems you have information that most of the people you mention are not privvy to. Do you care to back your claims and provide evidence? to name them, and the allegations your speaking of? We are not ALL aware of these things mate, the average herper is relatively new to the game, and while certain names might be prominent and familiar, such claims as your making are not commonly shared for the same reason Im betting, you will not publically accuse anyone of such things, for fear of litigation.
Its not as though theres some secret club of herper gossips, where a new herper can join and find out such things after a secret handshake..is there?
Even if there were, surely such allegations are likewise merely opinions until proven, as you say most claims against hoser are.
Hosers smuggled books allude to many such allegations but provide little in the way of evidence, where is document charges/investigations into these people, and where are such made available to the general public?
Finding and cross refrencing such things would indeed be time consuming, particulary to those with little intrest in dirty buisness and 'herp dirt' to begin with.
Hosers venomoid issue IS on the otherhand, readily related to all and sundry, even new folk in the game by way of forums, petitions etc, not to mention the bloke himself hardly makes an effort to avoid such publicity, you said so yourselves. You can hardly expect other than what you describe then, until you stand and loudly and publically start naming these 'icons' and the deeds you alledge of them, untill they remain somewhat, 'obscurely famous' (yes an oxymoron as the case may be) and as you said, free of accusation.
Folk who dont have a clue wont care and can hardly feel obliged to 'do something about it'.
I didnt start this and wouldnt have bothered myself unless Ray had taken up my offer. Please Keep that in mind.